When pressed further, Bloomberg insisted that he was the man in charge at all times."
Sure, except during snowstorms in December, we guess. But it's time that all of Bloomberg's shucking and ducking was stopped cold: "Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Saturday schedule said “no public events,” and on Sunday he had a pre-taped radio address. But where was the mayor this weekend and who was in charge during his absence? Bloomberg deflected that question posed by CBS 2′s Marcia Kramer on Monday during a news conference. “I was in charge of the city and in terms of public events, I will give you the phone number of Stu Loeser. He has the public schedule. He’ll be happy to tell you what’s on it,” Bloomberg said."
This is no longer tolerable behavior after we have seen first hand what happens when the city is rudderless in a crisis-and let's credit El Diario's Gerson Borrerro for first pointing out the terrorist concerns (subsequently cribbed by the Daily News' Michael Daley). And the following exchange between the mayor and Marcia Kramer should seal the Vallone deal-and the mayor should be forced to wear a GPS ankle monitor given his arrogant attitude:
"Kramer: Don’t you think that the public has a right to know whether you’re in charge. Who’s in charge?
Bloomberg: I told you miss that I’m in charge.
Kramer: Peter Vallone says…
Bloomberg: I don’t know what Peter Vallone says, you should talk to Peter Vallone.
Kramer: In times of a terrorist attack…when cell phones go down and when electronics go down, they have the right to know someone who’s in charge.
Bloomberg: The mayor was in charge all the time."
All of which throws the ball into the council speaker's court. We'll give CBS the last word: "Now the question may be whether the mayor is able to prevent the Vallone bill from ever coming up for a vote."